back to op-ed archives
On the Holiness of Jerusalem
in Judaism and Islam
by Jonathan Silverman
(January 2002)
For 3000 years the eternal city of
Jerusalem has held the most exalted position in the Jewish
religion, and a place of unparalleled importance in Jewish
life and history.
First and foremost, King Solomon
built the first Holy Temple in Jerusalem between the years
965 and 928 BCE. At that time the Holy Temple was the stronghold
of the Jewish religion, containing the Holy Ark and the
holiest altar in the nation for bringing ritual sacrifices
as offerings to God. The people of Israel would come to
the Holy Temple to pray and to give thanks but especially
to perform sacrifices on the three festivals of pilgrimage:
Passover, Shavuot and Sukkot. The actual performance of
the sacrifices in the Holy Temple was reserved for the priests
(cohanim) who were descendants of Aaron. But in the year
586 the Babylonian monarch Nebuchadnezzer invaded Jerusalem,
destroyed the Holy Temple, carried off its implements made
of precious metals, and exiled the Jews of Jerusalem to
Babylon.
Although Nebuchadnezzer had laid
waste to the Holy Temple, its holiness remained, and it
was then the Jewish exiles swore, "If I forget you
Jerusalem, may I forget my right hand and may my tongue
adhere to the roof of my mouth if I do not remember, if
I do not hold Jerusalem above my greatest joy," and
generations of Jews have kept this vow to the present day.
The nation longingly remembered the holiness of Jerusalem
throughout thousands of years of exile.
When Nehemiah returned from Babylon
around 536 with the first group of exiles the city was rebuilt,
and the Holy Temple and Jerusalem were again the principle
focus of national religious life until the destruction of
the Second Temple by the Romans in the year 70 CE. Following
the suppression of Bar Kochva's revolt, the Roman Legions
burned all of Jerusalem to ashes and in its place built
a pagan city they called Aelia Capitolina, which Jews were
forbidden from entering for generations.
The strong, heartfelt desire every
Jew has to see Jerusalem rebuilt in his lifetime and the
centuries-deep Jewish affection for the city King David
founded are embodied in many important customs and prayers
from Judaism's great sages. For example, the prayer: "And
to Jerusalem, your city mercifully return, and dwell within
it as you said. And build in it soon in our lifetimes, the
building for eternity, and may it hold a place for King
David's throne," is repeated by every praying Jew several
times a day.
In brief, those are the religious
fundamentals on which Jerusalem's holiness stands in the
Jewish faith. The Rambam outlines it even more succinctly:
"It is a tradition with all that the place in which
David and Solomon built the sacrificial altar and which
held the Holy Ark on its floor is the place in which Abraham
built an altar and bound Isaac on it, and it is the place
on which Noah built when he came out of the ark, and it
is the altar on which Cain and Abel sacrificed, and on which
Adam sacrificed when he was created and on which he was
created. As the sages say: "He was created from his
place of atonement." In other words, as the passage
from the Rambam illustrates, the reason Jerusalem is the
holiest city in Judaism is that in the 5000-year span of
Jewish religious life the nation's devotion to God has intersected
more with this city and more intensely than with any other.
Various factors make Jerusalem
holy to Muslims
At first glance, the holiness of
Jerusalem in the Muslim tradition is also religious at heart,
and stems from the belief that Muhammad the prophet-founder
of Islam rose to heaven from the site of the Holy Temple
in Jerusalem. But it seems other factors beside religion
played a role too.
After the prophet died in June 632,
a series of successors, or caliphs, assumed authority as
Islam's leaders. Between 661 and 750 the Umayyad Dynasty
held the Caliphate and ruled from Damascus. During the time
they ruled, due to various internal and external pressures,
the Umayyads exerted enormous effort to elevate Jerusalem's
status, perhaps even to the level of Mecca.
Daniel Pipes wrote in the Middle
East Quarterly:
"The first Umayyad ruler, Mu'awiya, chose Jerusalem
as the place where he ascended to the caliphate; he and
his successors engaged in a construction program -- religious
edifices, a palace, and roads -- in the city. The Umayyads
possibly had plans to make Jerusalem their political and
administrative capital. . . . But Jerusalem is primarily
a city of faith, and, as the Israeli scholar Izhak Hasson
explains, the 'Umayyad regime was interested in ascribing
an Islamic aura to its stronghold and center.'
"Toward this end (as well as
to assert Islam's presence in its competition with Christianity),"
Pipes continues, "the Umayyad caliph built Islam's
first grand structure, the Dome of the Rock, right on the
spot of the Jewish Temple, in 688-91. This remarkable building
is not just the first monumental sacred building of Islam
but also the only one that still stands today in roughly
its original form."
The next step the Umayyads took to
make Jerusalem holy to Islam relates to a passage in the
Quran (17:1) that describes Muhammad's Night Journey to
heaven: "Glory to He who took His servant by night
from the Sacred Mosque to the furthest mosque (al masjidi
al aqsa)."
Pipes explains that when this Quranic
passage was first revealed, in about 621, a place called
the "Sacred Mosque" already existed in Mecca.
"In contrast," he goes on, "the 'furthest
mosque' was a turn of phrase, not a place. Some early Muslims
understood it as metaphorical or as a place in heaven."
In other words, the line about the
furthest mosque in the Quran is just a figure of speech.
Which means there is no basis for associating the furthest
mosque -- the Quranic location of the start of Muhammad's
Night Journey -- with the city of Jerusalem.
In 715, Pipes writes, the Umayyads
did something very clever. To build up the prestige of their
domain, they built a second mosque in Jerusalem, again on
the Temple Mount, and named this one the "Furthest
Mosque" (i.e. al-masjidi al-aqsa), the exact same name
written in the holy Quran. And in so doing, the Umayyads
forced the city of Jerusalem to assume a role in the life
of the prophet Muhammad. A role which it never had. This
is how the Muslim belief in the holiness of Jerusalem, which
persists to this day, originated.
It's impossible to escape the conclusion,
as the Palestinian historian A.L. Tibawi writes, that building
an actual Al Aqsa Mosque "gave reality to the figurative
name used in the Quran . . ." As Pipes points out,
moreover, "it had the hugely important effect of giving
Jerusalem a place in the Quran post hoc which naturally
imbued the city with a higher status in Islam." Which
is another way of saying, before the Umayyads built the
Dome of the Rock and Al Aksa, Jerusalem had no status at
all in Islam.
Israeli scholar Izhak Hasson says,
"construction of the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa mosque,
the rituals instituted by the Umayyads on the Temple Mount
and the dissemination of Islamic-oriented traditions regarding
sanctity of the site, all point to the political motives
which underlay the glorification of Jerusalem among the
Muslims." In other words, the sanctification of Jerusalem
in Islam is based on the Umayyad building program. And it
demonstrates their cleverness in bringing about a (baseless)
association between the al-masjid al-aqsa mentioned in the
holy Quran and the mosque they built on the Temple Mount
and purposely named Al Aqsa, precisely so that it would
assume a measure of Quranic holiness it did not have.
Perhaps the most convincing evidence
of Islam's very loose and insignificant bond with Jerusalem
is how the Muslims related to the city after the Caliphate
passed from the Umayyads to the Abbisids in 750. Daniel
Pipes writes, "Jerusalem fell into near-obscurity.
For the next three-and-a-half centuries, books praising
this city lost favor and the construction of glorious buildings
not only came to an end but existing ones fell apart (the
dome over the rock collapsed in 1016)."
These days, the never-ending cry
for a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital surely
contains a trace of the claim that the city is holy in Islam.
But, essentially, the historic record shows that the actions
and circumstances on which the claim is based aren't very
holy at all. In fact, by any standard of religious values
in any society in the world, artificially imbuing a place
with holiness, through wordplay and administrative sleight
of hand, constitute the very opposite of holiness.
-- Jonathan
Silverman
New York, 2002
(This essay originally appeared in
the e'zine IsraelInsider.com. Reprinted by permission of the author.)
Copyright © 2002 by Jonathan Silverman. For reprint permission, or to contact the author, click here.
Note: Café editorials reflect the opinions of their authors: the Café's management and staff, and invited guests. They are not necessarily endorsed by any or all of those who provide the content for our various newsletters.
|