We're all entitled
to go to hell in our own way, so long as we don't
drag anyone else along with us against his or
her will. So if you want to smoke, go right ahead
-- just as long as I don't have to inhale with
you.
But, if you're a smoker,
let's not pretend that you're anything other than
seriously addicted to a toxic substance. And let's
not pretend that your addiction is purely voluntary,
a matter of individual choice and free will. It
may have begun, as did mine, in the womb, through
your mother's bloodstream, if she smoked (if we
acknowledge the existence of "crack babies,"
let's recognize the logical parallel of "nicotine
babies" too). Or it may have started later.
But your encounter with nicotine, and your indoctrination
into the culture of nicotine addiction, began
the moment you flew the gestational coop; you
were birthed into a world of cigarette smoke,
cigarette smokers, and cigarette merchandising.
However long thereafter you picked up your first
coffin nail, you'd not only been exposed to endless
cubic yards of second-hand smoke, but to years
of omnipresent, incessant pro-smoking propaganda.
Don't think for a minute that the decision to
light up was entirely your own.
I smoked my own first cigarette
in 1957, at the age of 14, convinced that it would
make others think of me as more mature and manly
than I looked. (Where on earth could that idea
have come from? Surely not from Marlboro ads .
. . ) Within a year I was smoking a pack a day.
In 1972, when I was 28, having by then smoked
a pack a day for half my life -- over 5000 packs,
which probably cost around $4000 back then, no
small sum during that period -- I managed to quit
for good. It took me some eight attempts to break
the addiction, surely the most virulent and pernicious
of my entire life experience. I did it cold turkey,
experienced a very difficult withdrawal that lasted
several months, and didn't really get it out of
my system for a year.
So I have a great deal
of sympathy for those addicted to this substance,
and recognize all of their excuses, rationales,
discourtesies and other failings, having manifested
them all myself at one time. I have absolutely
no sympathy for the lying, greedy bastards at
the helm of the tobacco industry, or the corrupt
politicians (read: Sen. Jesse Helms and his cronies)
who are their government stooges; and my empathy
for the people lower down on the chain of command,
including the tobacco-factory workers and the
tobacco-field hands, is roughly on a par with
my commiseration with the plight of people forced
to grow opium for a living. They're participants
in the merchandising of disease and death, however
you slice it.
I'll never know how much
long-term, irreversible damage I did to my health
by smoking, of course. Are some of those consequences
my own damn fault? Sure -- even though I was a
naive, impressionable kid when I started. Might
some of the blame be properly placed on the shoulders
of the nicotine-addiction industry? I happen to
think so -- and those two positions are not contradictory.
I'm sitting here looking
at a souvenir program for a 1950 National League
baseball game between the Phillies and the Yankees.
Casey Stengel was managing the Yanks, Billy Martin
was on second, DiMaggio was in the outfield and
Yogi squatted behind the plate. I was already
a (Brooklyn) Dodgers fan at that time, so these
guys were the arch-enemies, but still they were
demi-gods; their word was good with me.The program
is filled with cigarette ads. Phil Rizzuto (a
cigarette hanging from his lips) and Robin Roberts
instruct me to "Make YOUR next pack Chesterfields."
Would a little kid have felt some impulse to emulate
them and follow their advice?
But the
ad that really grabs my attention now is the
one for Old Gold cigarettes. Illustrated with
someone's version of an Indian "medicine
man" (this was before the days of "Native
American"), it presents a text that astonishes
in its disingenuousness, duplicity, and outright
fraudulence. Listen to this: |
|
"No medical war
whoops from Old Gold . . . We're Tobacco Men
not Medicine Men! Not for all the wampum in
North America would we join the chorus of 'medical'
claims for cigarettes. For nearly 200 years
our sole profession has been curing just one
thing -- the world's best tobacco. We believe
that for top smoking enjoyment, your most convincing
medicine is -- just light up and enjoy an Old
Gold. No friendlier flavor . . . no mellower
mildness . . . no more deep-down smoking pleasure
-- that's your Old Gold! For a Treat instead
of a Treatment treat yourself to Old Golds!"
"'Medical' claims
for cigarettes"? Such claims were the work
of quack doctors in the hire of the tobacco industry.
What a clever trick : Pay a bunch of venal M.D.s
to concoct "scientific evidence" that
smoking actually benefits your health, then modestly
reject those claims -- while at the same time
implanting them ever more firmly in the public's
unconscious.
These people -- the heads
of the tobacco industry, their medical hirelings,
their PR staffs, their research divisions -- are
a crowd of conspiratorial, lying, cynical drug
dealers who have knowingly been poisoning millions
of people for profit for decades: serial killers
who should be arrested on criminal charges and
put on trial for mass murder. The tobacco industry
stockholders who've profited from this trade in
sickness and death should be pilloried publicly,
and have their profits seized. And all those who
work in this industry should be ashamed of themselves;
all are implicated in this massive crime.
The extent of the duplicity
of the tobacco industry's top management -- lying
to the public, perjury before the U.S. Congress,
cover-up and destruction of vital evidence, obstruction
of justice -- has begun to become internationally
known at last. The documents that have come to
light over the past 2-1/2 years provide incontrovertible
evidence, going back decades, proving that they
knew all along that they were peddling narcotic
addiction.
Keep an eye on the massive
settlements that have started to roll in -- settlements
that have the industry heaving sighs of relief,
because they could have been much greater. Then
ask yourself if the nation's "war on drugs"
shouldn't have been directed at this enemy within
from the very beginning, and whether it wouldn't
make sense to direct it at them starting now.