By the time you read
this school will have started up again, and I'll
be back in the classroom, teaching. In my last
column, I reminisced about a grade-school teacher
who influenced me deeply. Here's my memory of
another who shaped my life.
The second teacher who
mattered was Professor Leonard Albert: Hunter
College in the Bronx (now Lehman College), fall
1964, age 16, my first college English class,
required of all entering freshmen, English Lit
101. I was already widely if eccentrically read
for my age, and had been writing - poetry, fiction,
political speeches - since starting high school.
Much of that I owed to my parents' gifts to me:
a love of words and books, a respect for writers
generally, the examples of themselves as readers
and writers and editors and publishers. But when
I stepped into Prof. Albert's classroom he handed
out to all of us a clear understanding of the
origins and evolution of the very language we
spoke and wrote yet in so many ways took for granted,
and in doing so changed my life.
He didn't hand this out
a mimeographed schematic or cheat sheet. He made
us internalize it by forcing us to hear it and
feel it coming up out of our own chests, through
our own mouths, off our own tongues. Let me interrupt
my tale here to note that I use that terminology
deliberately. Yes, he made us do this work, and
the force, if implicit, was no less real. We were
given no choice in the matter, were offered no
alternative assignments, did not have our preferences
consulted or considered, could not have inquired
why we had to learn this stuff whose relevance
to our lives was less than apparent. In that theater
of education we constituted a captive audience,
in every sense of that term, and our only option
was to leave it entirely - which, at least for
the males of draft age, was no choice at all.
He started us off on "Beowulf,"
the impenetrable original alongside a respected
translation, and then gave us Chaucer. No translation
or "modernization." Chaucer in the original
Middle English, all that weird spelling and guttural
Saxon and vaguely familiar but strangely accented
words with the stresses on the most unlikely syllables.
He helped us decode its meaning, laid out the
basic rules of grammar, syntax, spelling and pronunciation
over a few class sessions, then gave the two dozen
or so of us a weekend in which to memorize the
first twenty lines of the "Prologue"
to The Canterbury Tales.
The following Monday morning,
in alphabetical order according to last name,
we began reciting, and Prof. Albert began patiently
correcting. I was up early on, obviously. Some
of us got it down better than others, but none
of our efforts were less than embarrassing. Our
teacher said nothing to shame anyone who'd clearly
made the effort to fulfill the assignment. When
we weren't reciting, we listened to each other,
and to him. The next morning the recitals from
memory continued, with the first day's slackers
retested. Thursday he put Tuesday's slackers to
the test, and we began collectively working our
way, in class and out loud, through the "Prologue"
and into the tales.
A few people dropped out
- pointless, really, except as teacher-shopping,
since the course was mandatory and the curriculum
fixed by the department. By mid-semester the remaining
twenty or so of us could read any passage selected
at random in passable if halting Middle English,
and explicate what it meant, more or less, without
Prof. Albert's help and with only the glossary
to guide us. Without realizing it, I'd learned
something about how to learn, had even sniffed
something about how I learned. And, as a writer
and speaker, I'd been given an insight into the
DNA of my medium, a gift that, though I can't
speak for all my classmates, was received in that
room by others as well.
Finally, of course, I had
twenty lines of Chaucer engraved in my brain.
Over a third of a century later they're still
there, and I can launch into them at the drop
of a hat, as I've done in tandem with old friends
at class reunions and even at conferences with
colleagues - yes, photographers and photo teachers
and curators and historians - who went through
the City University system during the same era.
Did none of us any harm, so far as I can tell.
Bear with me, please. I'm
not making some E. D. Hirsch or Allan Bloom stand
here in favor of DWEM - dead white European males
- or a fixed canon or rote learning. I'm just
trying to convey something about the context in
which I found myself, for the first time I could
remember, cheerfully and eagerly setting out to
learn something unfamiliar and difficult whose
beneficial value to me I had to take on trust.
So I must also tell you
something about the setting, and the teacher.
By today's standards, the City University of New
York (of which Hunter was one division) was appallingly
regimented. Jeans and T-shirts were not permitted
anywhere on campus. Women who wore slacks instead
of skirts or dresses to school on any day the
thermometer did not read 30 degrees Fahrenheit
or below at 8 a.m. according to the city's official
radio station were refused admission to the campus.
(My cohort successfully fought for an end to that
particular idiocy, I'm proud to say.) Three full
absences from class meant an automatic failure;
a lateness of ten minutes counted as half an absence.
Of course we addressed all our faculty, and the
administration and staff, by their titles and
last names. We, in turn, were Mr., Miss (this
was pre-Ms.), or, infrequently, Mrs.
I couldn't tell you if
Prof. Albert was likeable as a person; though
I took every course with him the curriculum allowed,
we never had a private conversation. Teachers
and students then never socialized off-campus,
and hardly ever on - no departmental holiday or
birthday or farewell parties, no coffee klatches,
no bulletin boards with postcards from old grads,
no counseling from faculty on your love life,
fights with parents, drug usage. I seem to recall
there was a school psychiatrist - one - and I
never met anyone, no matter how troubled, who
visited him or her.
Prof. Albert clearly didn't
care whether any of us liked him, and made it
just as clear that he wasn't concerned with liking
us. He played no favorites, though his pleasure
in those who put effort into the class was discernible,
along with his irritation with those who did only
the bare minimum to get by. He wasn't by any means
sour or bitter, but I never heard him laugh and
rarely saw him smile; his humor was dry, manifesting
itself in occasional puns and oblique references
mostly available to those who kept up with the
readings.
So far as I could detect
in four years of studying with him, he had no
hidden agenda in relation to us as individuals
or as a group - only the overt, declared intention
of helping us achieve an adequate grasp of the
material and the broader subject. Some people
then - and certainly most people in the academic
system today - would probably consider him overly
formal, if not cold. I found that enormously liberating.
He himself knew the material forward and backward,
could recite most of it - all of Othello, forinstance
- from memory, knew the critical literature inside
and out as well. I saw in him a major resource,
and greedily took from him everything I could,
which he freely gave to all who asked; like one
of Chaucer's characters (I'll translate here),
"gladly would he learn, and gladly teach."
I don't say this to wax
nostalgic about the old days and the old ways.
I'm trying to describe a theater of teaching and
learning that had enormous impact on me and in
some important ways shaped my own sense of the
dramaturgy of the classroom, though I never taught
like Prof. Albert did, my own style having turned
out much more improvisational and informal. And
when I speculate that no English department today
would hire this man or his equivalent, I don't
mean it accusatorily; he'd simply seem like a
superbly trained Edwardian actor plunked down
awkwardly in a Living Theater production. My main
point is that I internalized that version of the
classroom as theater just before a series of major
stylistic changes in education began - changes
that generated new kinds of teachers and students
as well.